Developers don't like their projects delayed. Time is money. Two is, they don't like controversy around their projects. Controversy means time and money. What this will do is influence that process.

For those who are moving into developments that haven't paid full fees, there's no assurance that we can provide (educational) facilities. We have a fiduciary responsibility to advise buyers that there may be potential consequences because their development has not paid their fair share of fees.

We have had overcrowding and as growth continues, we will continue to have overcrowding unless adequate funding is brought to the table.

Now we can start slipping Atlas into all of our projects. I don't know if that's going to save money or reduce the cost of development, but we'll have a better user experience, and that's what we're after.

We don't count on the booth money for our operating budget, but it always funds one of our major projects.

Those who are developing projects that are creating the need for more roadway could put up the money for it.