no smoking guns of intentional illegality.

There is a second political issue about whether he made a misstatement about his knowledge concerning these blind trusts. That's something he has to explain — the lawyers can't do that for him. He has to explain why he made what seems to be an exaggeration.

There is a second political issue about whether he made a misstatement about his knowledge concerning these blind trusts, ... That's something he has to explain — the lawyers can't do that for him. He has to explain why he made what seems to be an exaggeration.

Everybody gets religion after a scandal, at least for a while. There are a lot of ethics rules in the House and Senate. The problem is that there either aren't enough rules or the enforcement has been insufficient.

Either he's got a lot of evidence he's holding back or he's shooting blanks. I just don't know.

The securities issue is potentially lethal for him. He has not yet really explained why he did this at this particular time.