Those are the things that we are looking at - how do you continue to provide the best benefits to employees and remain competitive? There's a genuine desire to do just that at Wal-Mart, but we feel like we can certainly improve our offerings today.

It's a benefit (employees) couldn't get on their own because they are an employee of this (bank) customer. We leverage our relationship with our customers.

I was the adult and he was the child. I am so ashamed for what I've done. I've betrayed so many people's trust.

More often than not, the error is in the customer's favor. We encourage our customers to point out any discrepancies, and when they do, we compensate them appropriately.

He is not only infringing on Wal-Mart's trademark, but he's also making an offensive association between Wal-Mart and one of the greatest tragedies of the past century. We certainly respect the rights and opinions of others, but we also must protect our trademark or we risk losing it.

This desperate attack has more holes than a pasta strainer. This is another paid attack by union critics.