We believe there are very strong reasons why the state Supreme Court should take this case. We really think that each individual case has to be decided individually.

My reading of that case is that the U.S. Supreme Court has said that the state legislature has plenary power, full power, in respect to appointment of presidential electors and that power cannot be eroded even by the state constitution,

I think probably that this is a case that will go to the Supreme Court, which means you probably won't have a verdict until 10 years down the line.

This is a good case to take to the Supreme Court.

States used to protect consumers from predatory lenders, but strong state usury laws were obliterated by a 1978 U.S. Supreme Court decision.

We believe that section 505 is unconstitutional for the same reasons that the Supreme Court found the [Communications Decency Act] to be invalid. Section 505 was adopted at the same time as the CDA and it incorporated exactly the same defective legal standard,